With this autumn symposium, organised by the section Risk Assessment from the Dutch Society for Toxicology (NVT), it was aimed to demonstrate the latest methodology and model development in the management of uncertainties in risk assessment. Speakers from RIVM, KWR and EFSA were invited to show their applications.

The symposium was started with an introductory presentation on probabilistic approaches, presented by Bas Bokkers a risk assessor and toxicologist from the National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM, NL). With this presentation insight was provided on probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) compared to deterministic risk assessment. The differences, advantages and disadvantages of both approaches were explained, showing that PRA can provide more informative conclusions including variability and uncertainty.

The applicability and usage of APROBA-Plus tool was subsequently demonstrated by Judith de Heer. Judith is a researcher working at the National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM, NL). During this session the usage of APROBA-Plus for deterministic compared to a probabilistic risk calculations was given. Multiple examples were showed on how to use and interpreted APROBA-Plus retrieved results.

The usage of APROBA-Plus for probabilistic risk assessment in a drinking water case study was presented by Renske Hoondert. Renske is a researcher and project manager working at KWR. During this case-study presentation the steps taken in PRA were explained to characterise the uncertainties and support better risk assessment to improve risk management.

During the final session Ullrika Sahlin an Associate Professor from Lund University provided an introduction to the need and methodology of expert knowledge elicitation (EKE), and how this can be used to support the characterisation of uncertainty in risk assessment. Ullrika has been an independent expert in EFSAs cross cutting working group on uncertainty and is currently providing trainings and support in EKE for EFSA. The audience were told that EKE was developed to counteract bias in expert judgement, as a systematic documented and reviewable process and uses probability to express uncertainty.

The post Making uncertainties in risk assessment visible: A journey towards informed decision making appeared first on Nederlandse Vereniging voor Toxicologie.

On Tuesday October 8th, from 13:00 to 17:00, the section of Risk Assessment will organize their autumn symposium. TNO Utrecht will host the session which can only be attended in person. During this symposium different methodologies and models for the analysis and management of uncertainties in risk assessment will be presented and discussed together with RIVM, EFSA and KWR. We are looking forward to inspiring discussions and hope to welcome many of you.

Location: TNO, Princetonlaan 6, 3584 CB Utrecht

Preliminary Program

You can register for this meeting by sending an email to

Sabine Jetten (sabine.jetten@tno.nl).

Email subject: “Registration NVT autumn symposium – October 8th”  and report your name, affiliation and NVT membership (Y/N*) in the email itself.

Registration closes on Monday September 30^th, 2024.

*NVT-members have priority during registration.

The post Section Risk Assessment | Autumn symposium 2024 | Making uncertainties in risk assessment visible, a journey towards informed decision making appeared first on Nederlandse Vereniging voor Toxicologie.

Date: 10 October 2023 (13.30 – 17.00 h)
Location: NVWA, Graadt van Roggenweg 400 in Utrecht

The post Summary and Presentations | REACH revision & endocrine disruption: Are we up for the challenge? appeared first on Nederlandse Vereniging voor Toxicologie.

Green Toxicology - How big is our footprint?

In the development and production of chemicals, sustainability plays an increasingly important role. But how sustainable is the work we perform daily in our laboratories on the toxicity testing of these substances? And how can you determine and reduce the footprint of your research?

• 1_Samenvatting-NVT-RA-voorjaarsbijeenkomst
• 2_LEAF-Addressing-the-Sustainability-of-Science_Martin-Farley-UCL.
• 3_Sustainability-at-the-RIVM_Eline-Politiek-RIVM
• 4_Sustainability-in-a-toxicology-lab-environment_Liesbeth-Segers-Charles-River-Laboratories

The post Summary and Presentations | Section Risk Assessment | Online Spring Symposium | Green Toxicology – How big is our footprint? | April 4th, 2023 | appeared first on Nederlandse Vereniging voor Toxicologie.

‘Understanding chemical micropollutants in water’
Our drinking water: monitoring & water quality protection

Together with KWR we played a ‘serious game’ in which we dove into drinking water quality and threats to our drinking water sources.

The post Summary and Presentations | Serious game: ‘Understanding chemical micropollutants in water’ | Section Risk Assessment | October 4th 2022 appeared first on Nederlandse Vereniging voor Toxicologie.

One substance – Multiple assessments
Titanium Dioxide considered from a food and pharma perspective

The post One substance – Multiple assessments | Summary and links to presentations appeared first on Nederlandse Vereniging voor Toxicologie.

Theo Vermeire – General introduction (presentation)

Theo provided an introduction to mixture toxicity, hazard and risk assessment, explaining definitions and currently ongoing initiatives worldwide. Theo provided further information on the different available risk assessment approaches, as e.g. the assessment approaches of SCHEER and US-EPA and the WHO framework for risk assessment of mixtures. Attention was paid to the problem formulation with regard to both exposure and hazard assessment. In a recent publication of Herzler (2021) further information is provided on which mixtures should be considered, e.g. substance which act together, individual substances of high concern, as not all mixtures will be considered for mixture risk assessment and risk management approaches.

Bruno Dujardin (EFSA) - Combined exposure to multiple chemicals - EFSA’s recent achievements and future perspectives (presentation)

Bruno spoke about ongoing initiatives and activities on mixture toxicity within EFSA, especially for non-intentional exposure to mixtures. Initially, the focus was at pesticides, with the Cumulative Assessment Groups (CAGs) for thyroid and CNS effects. In parallel, a guidance on risk assessment of combined exposure to multiple compounds was also issued.

Cumulative risk assessments were performed (2019-2020) retrospectively with focus on acute and chronic exposure to CNS and chronic exposure to thyroid. It included a hazard part (identification, characterization, cumulative risk assessment groups), an exposure part, based on market sampling (120.000 samples) which were combined with consumption data (20.000 subjects), and resulted in a risk assessment part with an uncertainty analysis. Main findings were: 1) the outcome is driven by a limited number of compounds 2) highest exposure was often due to 1 pesticide, 3) model estimations are very conservative, leading to an overall conclusion that the cumulative exposure to pesticides that have chronic/acute thyroid/CNS effects does not exceed the thresholds of regulatory consideration.

Future actions on the cumulative risk assessment of pesticides are scheduled by EFSA, in cooperation with DG Santé, e.g. prioritization of new CAGs. Furthermore, by 2030 EFSA and partners should be equipped for implementation for risk assessment of multiple chemicals, with a focus on dietary and non-dietary exposure for human health, with a stepwise implementation for dietary and aggregate exposure to pesticides and chemical in general, and with further development of methods (harmonized grouping criteria, OMICs data, aggregate exposure) and tools (open source).

An EFSA guidance document, on hazard driven criteria and prioritization methods, is to be expected to be finalized by December 2021.

Stephanie Melching – Kollmuss (BASF) - Experiences with cumulative risk assessments in the agrochemical industry and views (presentation)

Stephanie shared the experience of Croplife on the cumulative risk assessment addressing different compounds (within the group of pesticides), products and applications. As an introduction into the EU approach, initially work was started with establishment of CAGs to cover all relevant target organs, together with performing probabilistic exposure and risk assessments. As also presented by Bruno, from the retrospective cumulative risk assessments, the thresholds for regulatory consideration were not reached, after hazard and exposure-based refinements. However, future work is required, as is indicated in the EFSA/DG Santé action plan. This would also include prioritization with regard to hazard assessment (relevance CAGs, number of compounds in CAGs, dose at which the effect occurs, excluding compounds with low individual hazard quotients) and exposure assessment (realistic retrospective exposure, focus on major crops and uses). Croplife looked at specific groups, e.g. liver (with a focus on primary lesion, rather than the secondary lesions) or the reproduction/developmental CAGs. In addition, prioritization based on exposure is required. In order to avoid extensive refinements in mixture risk assessment, it is proposed to refine upfront by e.g. apply more stringent criteria to substance for inclusion into CAGs, consider only compounds for which the common toxic effect is very close to effect driving the reference value, use realistic exposure scenarios (e.g. maximum market share), monitoring background exposure, etc. Future challenges are aggregate exposures, availability of open data bases and risk management.

Lonneke van Leeuwen (RIVM, bureau REACH) – The EU Chemicals Strategy for sustainability towards a toxic-free environment: A Mixture Assessment Factor under REACH (presentation)

Lonneke presented on the EU Chemical Strategy for Sustainability (CSS) and recent ongoing work on the Mixture Assessment Factor (MAF) with a focus on the environment.

2009 is taken as a starting point with the Kortenkamp ‘State of the art report on mixture toxicity’. It concludes an assessment can be done, but should it also be regulated? In 2016 the RIVM published a thought starter on this topic. This report introduced a data driven mixture assessment factor (MAF) for the environment, and indicated that further work was needed to quantify a MAF. In 2020 the EU CSS was published describing a route to a toxic free environment with the goal to better protect human health and the environment and boost innovation. One of the strategic priorities to achieve this is to build a stronger EU legal framework to deal with mixtures. The focus is on unintentional mixtures.

In 2021 the RIVM has a publication in preparation that uses monitoring data for EU surface waters to identify trends in number of chemicals responsible for toxic pressure due to cumulative (environmental) exposure.

The first outcomes show time-place combination where in most situations 1 or 2 chemicals are present. There are only 376 time-place locations with more than 25 substances present. Further, it was observed that a large portion of the toxic pressure on freshwater bodies (> 90%), is caused by 20% of the chemicals. The chemicals that cause the issues are different between the monitoring locations. The current monitoring data shows that not all surface waters in the EU are properly protected. A general reduction of the RCR for single substances to 0.33 leads to an large improvement of the protection of EU surface waters.

RIVM will further investigate whether the same observations can be made based on a wider set of freshwater modelling data.

Annette Wilschut (DSM) – Mixed feelings (presentation)

Annette gave us a warming up for the discussion on the proposal for a MAF. Industry is recognizing the issue of combined exposure, however, is questioning whether the MAF is the right solution. How to balance the aim and the impact of the measure? Will the MAF solve the issue (e.g., legacy chemicals)? Is it proportional & targeted (e.g., via other targeted frameworks/permits)? What is the scientific basis (i.e., more insight in environmental compared to human risk)? How will it be implemented (e.g., prioritization, one-fits- all solution)? According to Annette, the complexity of the situation does not warrant a generic MAF. A set of targeted science-based solutions is the best way forward.

Discussion

There was a lively discussion from all areas of the playing field with experts highlighting the pros and cons of a generic MAF:

• Risk management has been trying to handle this for 30 years. When does the precautionary principle take over from science-based solutions?
• Only a few chemicals determine the effects, the balance does not seem right in this respect.
• Is there really an issue? Let’s target the active substances.
• Would the focus on better exposure and mechanistic data (and making this data publicly available) give us the opportunity for a more targeted approach to come to the critical scenarios and protect human health and the environment?

Diverging opinions were expressed. In the end it is up to policy makers to decide on the best approach in the coming years. Will this be a more general precautionary approach or a science based data driven approach in the end … The future will show us!

The post Autumn symposium: Mixture Toxicity appeared first on Nederlandse Vereniging voor Toxicologie.

 Online - Autumn symposium:

‘Mixture toxicity’

 October 5th 2021 (13.00 – 16.00 h)

 For many decades one substance-one risk assessment has been the standard in regulatory risk assessment. However, real life exposure is not limited to one chemical, and health and environmental risks of chemicals are not necessarily independent of each other. Over the last years slowly but steadily more approaches to evaluate the risks of exposure to chemical mixtures, taking into account possible interactions like synergism and addition, have been developed. It started with the evaluation of mixtures of similar chemicals with a common mechanism of action, like polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and dioxins, and moved further forward to intentional mixtures of chemicals, to UVCB’s and now even unintentional environmental mixtures. The topic is high on the political agenda.

In this autumn meeting of the NVT Risk Assessment Section, an overview of the current state of the art of the toxicological risk assessment of chemical mixtures will be presented as well as the most recent regulatory approaches installed by EFSA and ECHA and the position of industrial stakeholders.

We hope you all will have an inspiring, thought-provoking and informative meeting.

Program

You can register for this meeting by sending an email to Jacqueline Steenbergen- Biesterbos (j.w.h.biesterbos@nvwa.nl). Please report “Registration NVT autumn symposium – 5 October” in the title of the email and report your name and affiliation in the email itself.

A few days previous to the meeting you will receive an invitation via MS Teams which contains the link to the session.

The post October 5th Mixture toxicity -Autumn Symposium appeared first on Nederlandse Vereniging voor Toxicologie.

‘Alles wat u altijd al heeft willen weten over PFAS’

5 November 2020 (13.00 – 17.00 uur) – NVWA, Utrecht

Locatie: NVWA, Graadt van Roggenweg 400, Utrecht

Voorlopig programma:

U kunt zich aanmelden door een email te sturen naar Monique Nagtegaal (m.nagtegaal@nvwa.nl). Vermeld hierbij “Deelname NVT najaarsvergadering – 5 november” in het onderwerp. Vermeld ook uw naam en affiliatie in de mail.

The post ‘Alles wat u altijd al heeft willen weten over PFAS’ 5 november 2020 appeared first on Nederlandse Vereniging voor Toxicologie.

Online - Najaarsbijeenkomst:

‘Mengseltoxiciteit’

5 oktober 2021 (13.00 – 17.00 uur)

The post Save the date! appeared first on Nederlandse Vereniging voor Toxicologie.